tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17617194.post8293105919066049035..comments2024-03-07T06:52:34.516+00:00Comments on Exiled Preacher: God's IDGuy Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09184743462264437085noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17617194.post-11901632870971158572007-08-21T18:28:00.000+01:002007-08-21T18:28:00.000+01:00Hi Andrew,Yes, I'm trying to assess ID from the po...Hi Andrew,<BR/><BR/>Yes, I'm trying to assess ID from the point of view of presuppositional apologetics. Reymond is helpful on this as is John Frame. I got IVP's <I>New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics</I> from Aber. It has a useful article by Frame on Presuppositionalism. <BR/><BR/>The big problem with the whole ID project is that it's dominated by scientists and engineers. They don't always have a strong enough grasp of the <I>theological</I> implications of their arguments.Guy Davieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09184743462264437085noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17617194.post-84021544981431861562007-08-21T17:38:00.000+01:002007-08-21T17:38:00.000+01:00A really good, thought provoking post, Guy. Your s...A really good, thought provoking post, Guy. Your statements articulate many of my own sentiments on this issue. ID can quickly become a life ring which evangelicals cling to in the face of declining influence and a (supossed) lack intellectual credibility in our secular age. You strike a good balance between crediting the creation with declaring God's glory and convicting man's conscience, and weighing the more harmful implications of ID.<BR/><BR/>The opening of Robert L. Reymond's 'New Systematic Theology' is good on this as he eschews the normal formula of showing the rational arguments for the existence of God.Family Blogshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18139302128402850028noreply@blogger.com